The Dutch Philosophy of Birth
By Danell Swim
March 27, 2008
When I discovered I was expecting a baby during my posting to the Netherlands, I spent much of my pregnancy trying to work out how to avoid a traditional Dutch birth — at home and with no pain relief.But since the arrival of my bouncing baby son, I have become a convert to at least one aspect of the Dutch health system — home care for a week after birth by a maternity nurse who does everything from nappy-changing to cleaning and cooking.
The Dutch philosophy is that childbirth is a natural physical process that should not be medicalised unless there are complications, and should primarily be handled by midwives at home rather than by doctors in a hospital.
The Netherlands has the highest rate of home births in the western world at 30 percent, only 10 percent of women in labour are given pain relief and caesareans are relatively rare.
In contrast, about a third of babies are born by caesarean in the United States and about 20 percent in Britain, while only a tiny fraction of women have home births. Midwives who assist home births can even be prosecuted in some U.S. states.
Stunned that the Dutch believe labour pains are important for helping develop the mother-baby bond, I researched the anaesthesia policy at all the nearby hospitals only to discover that there was no guarantee of drugs at any of them.
The prospect of a home birth became all the more real when I was advised to have medical supplies on hand — including swabs and an umbilical cord clamp — and when metal stands were delivered to raise our bed to help the midwife during delivery.
Comments
One Response to “The Dutch Philosophy of Birth”
Got something to say?
“He argued that births should be centralised in about 30 to 50 maternity hospitals, staffed around the clock by gynaecologists, anaesthetists and other specialists.”
LOL I bet he did. I wonder if they’re jealous about how much money their American counterparts are making?